https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYg98pXiUqU&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
I aged 14 to 25 you got a lot of
testosterone on board that's not really
the conducive and not a lot of
myelination up here either so that the
worst combination the executive function
is not fully functioning and and the
testosterone is it take a lot more than
that okay my name is Robert Young ro BER
tyo you and J and I am the former Chief
Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court
give me your 60 second spiel on who you
are as far as what you
far too much until recently I was the
Chief Justice of Michigan Supreme Court
I'd been a member of the Supreme Court
for 18 years three years prior to that I
had been on the Michigan Court of
Appeals which is the intermediate court
in our system and before that as general
counsel at triple-a Michigan and before
that about 15 years of practice in a
private law firm you can hear it okay
yeah okay that's
I want you to be natural for you oh okay
yeah all right that's fine all right I'm
the former Chief Justice of the Michigan
Supreme Court I'd been a member of the
court until I retired for 18 years and
before that was three years on the
Michigan Court of Appeals which is the
intermediate court just below the
Supreme Court before that I was the
general counsel for triple-a Michigan
and before that 15 years in private
practice
yeah a lot of the difficulties that
surrounding slavery were there at the
very beginning when the Constitutional
Convention in 1787 was convened to try
and figure out how to put thirteen
individual colonies that function pretty
much like sovereign countries together
in a nation and apart from the
differences in the various colonies one
of the great differences was at the
North Boston all those were mercantile
commercial whereas the South Virginia so
they were agricultural so that was a one
big difference the Articles of
Confederation where the was the document
that was governed during the
Revolutionary War it worked very poorly
because it required unanimity of action
before he could do anything
the Continental Army under Washington
almost was starved to death because they
didn't get funding so the convention was
there to see if they could put together
a national government and the problems
were that each of these 13 colonies
thought of themselves as an autonomous
sovereign nation - there was a question
of slavery that was driven by the
agricultural needs of the south and the
repulsion that that created in the
northern colonies and that proved to be
a an insoluble problem first no one in
that generation of founders thought of a
multiracial society the way the 21st
century thinks and if I might add let me
read to you what Jefferson said on the
question and his notes - on the state of
Virginia if blacks did not intermarry
with whites they would remain black
until the end
of time for was not contemplated that
liberating them would whitewash them if
they did intermarry with whites then
with the white race would become extent
extinct and the American people would
become all of my auto breed again
without the mistake Jefferson let me
show you how one of the founders thought
about okay I mean let me show you how
one of the founders thought about race
at the time this is Jefferson in his
notes on the state of Virginia let me
share with you what Jefferson one of the
founders thought about slavery and how
to deal with the slaves if manumitted
I mean let me share with you what
Jefferson said in notes on the state of
Virginia concerning how the founding
generation thought about the slave
problem let me share with you what
Thomas Jefferson said about the what
they thought of as an insoluble problem
with liberating slaves if blacks did not
intermarry with whites they would remain
black for the end of time for if it was
not contemplated that liberating them
would whitewash them if they did
intermarry with whites then the white
race would become extent extinct
the American people would all be a
mulatto breed that was the problem for
many of the founding generation the the
best solution the abolitionists could
have come up with was to liberate and an
expatriate the former slaves to the West
which was then unsettled the Caribbean
or to take them back to Africa
but there was one additional problem and
that's no one in that founding
generation could figure out how to pay
for them because everybody believed that
slaves were property of their owners and
they had to pay for them in the first
budget of the new nation in 1790 the
entire federal budget was 7 million and
it was estimated that the cost of paying
the owners for their slaves was a
hundred and forty million so this was an
insoluble problem at that point too long
I know okay now the question is how do
they what do they do yeah I can do I'll
train yeah so what it okay ready so what
do they do they papered over the problem
first they in order to reduce the power
the political power of the south the
north insisted that slaves not be
counted one for one but three-fifths a
lot of people think of the three-fifths
as a slight against black people it was
really designed to reduce the political
power of the south in the Congress in
the house the second was the
and a restriction on the right of
Congress to prohibit the importation of
slaves for the next 20 years and the
third was the Fugitive Slave provision
in the Constitution that required that
slaves be captured and returned to their
owners
that was the sectional compromise and
that was what caused tension from that
point on
just Missouri Compromise additional
states
so we had the the fugitive slave acts
that were designed to implement the
constitutional provision requiring the
return of slaves to their owners and
again the the tension between the
southern opposition to slavery and the
South's intention to continue it was
what caused political problems in the
new nation in in in 1820 this all came
to a head because the nation was
expanding states were coming in and the
North was intent on precluding the
spread of slavery and the Missouri
Compromise of 1820 was the compromise
that precluded states coming into the
Union above the southern border of
Missouri from permitting slavery that
was the compromise at that point then
there were a series of slave rebellions
during this entire period the nat turner
rebellion in the 1830s was was perhaps
the most dramatic it prompted in
virginia prompted severe repressive laws
because Turner was educated and they
were they thought that that was probably
one of the reasons why they he was as
successful as he was so they were
oppressive laws out throughout the south
to preclude blacks from learning to read
and so forth that was the that was the
next critical thing and then the Supreme
Court entered the picture in 1842 and
interpreted the Fugitive Slave Act now
this is the act that the Congress had
passed that required slaves caught in
free areas to be returned to their slave
owners it held that state officials
this is widely unpopular in the north it
held that state officials did not have
could not be compelled to enforce the
law so that essentially eviscerate at
least in the north the enforcement of
the Fugitive Slave Act and that in turn
infuriated the South that began to
insist on a stronger Fugitive Slave Act
then came the compromise of of 1850
again the expansion of the the United
States with the addition of territories
and states caused this problem of the
south wanting more slave states to the
north wanting fewer the MS the
compromise of 1850
was a product of the acquisition of of
land from the Mexican War the United
States acquired land around basically
Texas and and West and then there was
the question of well what about these
new territories that were coming in and
this is where the south began to steal a
march and they insisted rather than the
Missouri Compromise that forbade slavery
above the certain point they decided on
local choice so that the territories
coming in could choose whether to be
slave or non slave and that was sort of
the unwinding of the Missouri Compromise
and then the next step was the
kansas-nebraska act again another crisis
precipitated by Nebraska wanting to come
in as a non slave state the southerners
were not willing to act on that unless
they were permitted to have permitted to
have a slave state and the compromise
they're essentially eviscerated the
Missouri Compromise entirely it was now
local choice for any territory or
state coming into the union after that
then kind of next in time and in
importance was the Dred Scott case this
is one of the most notoriously bad
decisions of the United States Supreme
Court and briefly it involved a Dred
Scott whose original owner had in said
he was going to to free him he died his
wife thence inherited Scott and his
family and there's a very complicated
history but he sought to purchase
himself as the his owner's wife refused
it ended up in court in Missouri it was
recognized that whereas it in his case
he'd been taken to a free state that
automatically led to being freed they
reverse their president and said no
that's no longer the law so he lost the
Missouri he then went to federal court
and ultimately ended up in the Supreme
Court which which held surprisingly that
black folks never were and never could
be citizens so they couldn't avail
themselves of any of the privileges of
being in federal court or of the
Constitution they were essentially
outside the Constitution and for good
measure the court also held that the
Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional
because Congress had no authority to
affect the rights of slave owners so
that was the double whammy of Dred Scott
and I said one of the worst decisions
that the Supreme Court gave
then we have the Civil War the Dred
Scott was considered one of the many
precipitating factors for the Civil War
but the reality was the economic
interest of the two regions north and
south are very different slavery had
become even more important after the
cotton gin before the cotton gin the
price of cotton and silk were about the
same because cotton was so hard to to
cultivate and and manufacture after the
cotton gin that that process was made
much easier and so when everybody
thought would happen that the slavery
would die the cotton gin made slavery a
much more viable institution so the the
the economic systems of north and south
are growing apart
slavery was was one of the leading but
not only cause of some of this division
civil war occurred and afterward the
victorious north through the military
controlled the entirety of the
secessionist states the Confederate
states were militarily ruled the federal
military imposed new governments they
took the old government out and the
legislature elected new ones that was
the first time blacks have been elected
in in the legislatures in the south
obviously and took a whole lot of years
and later before that happened again and
the and grant when he was president used
the military actively to suppress
organizations like the Ku Klux Klan that
had begun to terrorize to intimidate and
and place blacks back into the position
of servitude they had been in and during
slavery at the end of Reconstruction
when the military withdrew the
Democratic Party which began to
represent the southern interests
reemerged they reelected the
legislators that favored the southern
cause and immediately began creating
what we called the Jim Crow laws that
made it impossible for blacks as a
matter of law to vote to participate in
the civil society and to resub de gate
them in effect now this is this is after
the enactment or the ratification of the
Civil War amendments the 13th 14th
amendment Thirteenth eliminated slavery
14th assured equal protection under the
law to former slaves and the 15th
protected voting rights so these these
Jim Crow laws were a direct attempt to
negate the constitutional benefits that
blacks gained under the Civil War
amendments and that proceeded for a very
long time until Plessy vs. Ferguson
where the Supreme Court for the first
time in 1896 decided what the 14th
amendment meant to black folks mr.
Ferguson bought a first-class ticket in
Louisiana but Louisiana law made it a
crime to permit him to sit in the
first-class seat so he was placed in the
baggage compartment he complained he was
arrested and tried criminally for
violating the law he appealed that
appeal eventually went to the Supreme
Court which held that the 14th amendment
whatever else it did did not require a
state to Accord black people the same
rights as white people they would not
enforce his first-class ticket the same
way that a white person who had bought
it would have had it enforced and that's
that proceeded until Brown
probably everybody in the audience has
heard about Brown versus Board of
Education and it was brown plus he
established the separate but equal
doctrine Brown struck that down and
that's sort of a quick history of
Constitution and slavery okay
everybody brows on straight
all right so as one of the first a great
northwestern short show what it takes to
gain access to be accepted our family
was one of the first ones to move to
Northwest Detroit in 1960 we were the
only family on the Block when we moved
in there there's only one sort of
disconcerting episode that I remember
the neighbor sort of a squirt part of
the ghetto we came from but pretty much
it was a very easy transition it was a
people were genial and friendly and
didn't have much recollection of having
difficulty it was right next to Wooding
ham it was on whittingham next to near u
of D high school and I only have pretty
much happy memories from there but there
are challenges when you are the racial
wedge being the only or one a few does
present some issues about different
experiences different expectations some
sometimes very ugly ones and you just
have to you have to solder through those
yeah well I was not until I went to
private school to Detroit Country Day I
was the first black graduate from
Country Day I was from Detroit most of
the kids that went to Country Day at the
time we're in the Birmingham and
Bloomfield and there it was a lonely
time because they were there was
essentially no socialising other than
formal school events it was an isolating
point not as many as you might think
they weren't you know in your face kind
of ugly racial it was just pretty
obvious that there was you know I was
not of them and at least socially there
I had a few really good friends who came
over to my house and I went over them
but but especially when I got into high
school you know that's when teenagers
begin to have a social life independent
and and it was that was the time when it
was painfully obvious that I was not
part of that at world
[Laughter]
of course of course sure that they never
had any experience but I hadn't had a
lot of experience either with white
people I grew up in a pretty much until
lay a little later in an all-black world
I thought based on television that all
white folks lived slept in twin beds it
wasn't till I went over to somebody one
of my friends house and so their parents
slept in the same bed just like by but
in the movies and on TV all white people
slept into it married couples slept in
twin bed so there are a lot of
opportunities given the way our culture
shapes our vision of the other to have a
very skewed understanding and it's only
two you start interacting with people in
a more intimate way that you learn that
people are kind of like one another I'm
probably more like than not you have
different traditions different tastes
but pretty much we're we're a lot alike
that's fine probably oh yeah that's
right
Thurgood Marshall probably his greatest
contribution to our history was his role
in Brown versus Board of Education
after Plessy and at the turn of the mid
century from from the about the 40s and
50s on talented lawyers like Marshall
working with the N double AC Defense
Fund began to look for target cases to
chip away at the the separate but equal
holding of Plessy and that was because
they were in the south they were locked
out of any political process they
couldn't go to the legislature and say
get rid of the poll tax as the precluded
blacks from voting or or anything else
so they found a more hospitable forum in
the federal court so they started taking
cases to see if they could get that case
and eventually that led to the Supreme
Court decision in Brown and I think that
was a a monumental task of trying to
find the right case to test and then
overturn the separate but equal doctrine
we say I believe Thurgood Marshall's
greatest contribution to
african-americans freedom was oh okay
okay let me try that
I think Thurgood Marshall's greatest
contribution was was brown versus board
of education he was essential in framing
the that test case to challenge and
overturn the Plessy separate-but-equal
doctrine and he and many others had
worked a long time to frame the case
that eventually got to be the Plessy
versus I'm sorry that did overturn the
Plessy doctrine of separate but equal
okay he and many others work to find the
perfect case the test case to bring it
to the Supreme Court again to overturn
the plessis separate but equal doctrine
and it was a monumental task
they had no alternatives in the
political process in the South you
couldn't go to legislature so the
federal courts became the tactic to to
overturn the Jim Crow laws
you don't have to cut it as former chief
justice of mr. one of the things that
that has been important to me in my
judicial career is respecting the
constitutional assignments that are made
we we have a division of labor between
the executive the legislative and their
judicial the legislature makes the
statutes the executive enforces them and
the judicial branch interprets them and
I think that is the important function
of the judiciary it's not to make policy
but it's to interpret the statutes that
other two branches have made and I it's
important for black folks to be involved
in the political process to get the
statutes that they want the policies
they want enacted but it's not the the
judicial branch is obligation or even
authority to make laws in the way the
legislature is that's an important
distinction
civil rights
I was actually a teenager I was around
when Martin Luther King was alive oh
yeah I was a teenager no no no 67 and
what but yeah but yeah same impact
voting whether in in the civil rights
era or today has the same impact if you
don't participate as a voter you have no
voice and and it's a betrayal of all who
came before us to fight for that very
right I mean we got that right in the
Civil War amendments in the Fifteenth
Amendment but it was deprived of it of
us and in the south until the mid last
century and for for when I hear black
folks say it doesn't make any difference
I just it just causes me such pain to
know that all those who came before us
fought so hard for us to be able to
participate in the process and to make a
difference it's that's a it's an
unimaginable position for me
personal question did one now father use
for this one because and we discuss that
more later but all right beside
segregation in schools lunch counters
and many other facets of life I growing
up during the the beginning of the civil
rights era and through it what what
strikes me is how many ways in which
black people were negated in one way or
another
more more viciously and openly in the
south but in the North where I lived in
Detroit there were places where we
couldn't go it wasn't they didn't have a
law saying it but you knew you couldn't
go so that there were and at least were
some of them were tiny indignities when
my parents were taking me to a whi camp
in 1963 and ice go to Michigan there was
no place for them to stay overnight so
there are large and small indignities
that you suffered as a black person and
you were always aware of it
not away serve as trustee in church and
the people I have had a blessed life
I've had an opportunity to do a lot of
important things and I've always spent
my family's tradition that you always
help those who are in need of help and
so almost all of my activities outside
of work have been devoted to children's
charities and and civic institutions to
to help the community it's it's a
natural part of how I function how the
expectations that were given to me by my
parents and it's - to whom much is given
much is owed having I'm old now so I
have a broader perspective on things I
was around and conscious as a teenager
in the pre Civil Rights period watched
the civil rights period through that
today when we were negroes we understood
where we were we knew we had to fight -
as they used to tell me as a kid you
have to work twice as hard to get half
as far but that was a that was a in
hansung philosophy it was one devoted to
self-improvement and work and hard work
I when I work with women and minorities
other in our society one of the things
that has come clear to me is we are very
fearful of
coming into contact with the ugly part
of whatever discrimination there is and
my observation as many of us function
with a ceiling that we impose on
ourselves and so my thought to two young
black men and women is fill the
available space because you'll find
there's far more space than you think
there is and if you function as though
there's more space you live a bigger
life okay I don't think the Fugit on the
part of the Constitution that created
the obligation to return slaves the
fugitive slave acts both in the
beginning of the nation and the one
enacted in nineteen eighteen fifty were
designed to enforce that constitutional
obligation to return slaves to their
owner that the earlier one was
eviscerated by the Supreme Court when it
said it it that the Congress could not
force state officials to enforce the
statute so in the north they stopped
enforcing it that led to the 1850
version which was much more stringent
and which was it it it imposed criminal
penalties on state officials who refused
to assist the Bounty Hunter's dragged
blacks back to their owners led to a lot
of free blacks being enslaved there was
a whole movie about a true story about a
person who was enslaved for 12 years who
was a freeman 12 years of slave was the
name
it lacks any rights the white man was
bound to respect under Dred Scott no
under Dred Scott there were no rights
that blacks had at all not not not that
they there was any of that White's had
to respect they were essentially a race
from the Constitution by that decision
that's why the Civil War amendments were
necessary two to one free the slaves
ensure they had equal protection of the
law and the right to vote well oddly
enough in the in the at the formation of
the nation slavery even in the South was
not often justified on moral grounds but
on pragmatic grounds the the moral
justification for slavery became much
more important in the 19th century than
it had been in the 18th and it's the
same as always
God didn't didn't intend for slaves to
be considered human beings
just strange well I think the course of
my life has given me reason to be
optimistic
we've gone from my mother just passed
away she was 92 years old within the
course of her life
we went from and she grew up in the
south as did my father grew up in the
most coarse ugly Jim Crow world where
hanging literally lynching a box was not
an uncommon thing to a point where you
know my father became a physician he
eventually opened his own clinic he was
one of the first black physicians to do
so even if he had to have a Jewish
colleague buy and get the mortgage for
him because he couldn't get a mortgage
from the bank but by force of will by by
having a vision and the energy to do it
we've done amazing things I'm just
worried about whether we can sustain the
the commitment that we've shown
everywhere else I'm worried that in from
a period of slavery to not to virtually
now we've had nothing but increased
educational literacy we're seeing a
decline of literacy now how can that be
those are the things that I'm very
optimistic I mean how is it that a
people who were enslaved have managed to
to not just survive but to prosper now
we need to make sure that we continue to
prosper that's why I tell people to fill
the available space don't shrink down
don't expect something and if you've
encounter it take it on
all right see swagger doesn't such as I
did well the question is how in the pre
Brown era you could achieve rights under
the law under the the Jim Crow laws and
the reality is you couldn't in the south
and so that's why resort to the federal
courts was was had by people like
Thurgood Marshall and others in in that
movement that was a that was a challenge
just to get the the laws consistent with
the Constitution the Constitution now
after the Fourteenth Amendment required
that black people and everybody be given
equal treatment in the law does Jim Crow
laws clearly did not the separate but
equal doctrine was a first it was not
there was no equality it was in fact
designed to prevent equality
so once the laws got aligned with the
Equality requirement of the 14th
amendment then then you're free to use
the political process to vote to support
your candidates to get the policies you
want
you you said you wanted a release I
release you and whatever manner you need
to use the images and statements I've
made a really no compensation now my son
told me that I get no compensation now
I'm happy to do this for the public good
whatever that is I'm Robert Young former
chief justice the Michigan Supreme Court
and I'm going to set with NGP I'm Robert
Young former Chief Justice of the
Michigan Supreme Court and I'm on the
set of NGP what I say oh okay okay all
right
I'm Bob Young I'm the former Chief
Justice of the Michigan Supreme Court
I'm on the set with NGP I'm Robert Young
I'm the former Chief Justice of the
Michigan Supreme Court and I'm on the
set with NGP
I think I like because you got the boat
I'm your former judge you dig to find
everything like that so in GP is how we
branded multi okay okay I'm Robert young
I'm the former Chief Justice of Michigan
Supreme Court and I'm on the set with
NGP getting down to the nitty gritty
you
No comments:
Post a Comment